Archive for the ‘Glenn Beck’ Category
Perhaps he can redeem himself at some point. But he sure is displaying some unsound thinking.
I liked his show on FOX.
He did a good job there with his diagrams, helping people connect the dots and showing viewers how Obama was hiring all these Maoists and Communists in key positions — i.e. Anita Dunn (White House Communications Director and self-professed Maoist) and Van Jones (self-professed Communist) and others.
What I liked most about Glenn Beck is he seemed to really appeal to women.
My wife Wanda loved Glenn Beck – used to DVR all his shows on FOX.
She wasn’t at all political. But Glenn connected with Wanda, helped engage her in politics, helped turn her into a conservative.
I’m sure she still likes him.
My three daughters have also been big fans of Glenn Beck.
I think one reason females like Glenn Beck is all the emoting and weeping.
He seems to really care.
I’m not a big emoter and weeper myself, but I can deal with that. If Glenn Beck can appeal to women by emoting and weeping, I’m all for him.
But when I’ve listened to his radio show lately, I really can’t find much of value. I actually like his cohost quite a bit better than Beck. I don’t know what his name is. He’s a young guy who generally makes more sense than Beck has been making lately.
In my opinion, Glenn Beck is talking too much about religion — at least for me.
Sorry, I’m not a Mormon. I’m a traditional Christian. Sometimes I go to Catholic Mass. Sometimes I go to an evangelical Bible Church.
But to me, Mormonism makes no sense. I like most Mormons as individuals. But I’m not going to take spiritual advice from Mormons.
Also, when I tune into conservative talk radio, I want to hear about politics and what Obama is up to. I’m not looking for spiritual guidance.
I get spiritual guidance from the church I attend, also from books I read.
So Glenn Beck’s big push of late is to make a big deal about his Mormon faith and how he’s delivering Teddy Bears, Soccer Balls and, I guess, food and other necessities to the tens of thousands of Central American children who are showing up in U.S. border towns.
Fine. It’s a humanitarian crisis — created by Obama.
But that’s really the point, isn’t it?
The crisis is created intentionally by Obama to achieve his Open Border policy objectives. That is, to destroy the United States of America by transforming the electorate.
So we have this humanitarian crisis — created by Obama. And now we have Glenn Beck — the dupe that he is — lecturing us about how we have a Christian obligation to these children who Obama brought into the country.
Certainly we have a Christian obligation to do what we can for these children — to make sure they don’t starve, that they received medical care, that they aren’t killed or sold as sex slaves by gangs and cartels.
But then we need to send them home.
There really is no other solution, no other answer.
If we say, fine, all of you can stay here, this just sends the message out to the rest of the world that if you find a way to get to America, you can stay in America,
All you have to do is set foot on American soil (by hook or by crook) and you get to stay. You even get to become an American citizen.
You become a voter . . . for the Democratic Party.
And that’s really what all this is about, at least as far as Obama and the Democrats are concerned.
They are trying to create millions of new voters for the welfare state.
But even that’s not quite the point about Glenn Beck, is it?
What Glenn Beck is doing is feeding into the Obama propaganda machine.
If you don’t believe me, ask yourself the following questions:
1) Do we have impoverished American citizens here at home we should be feeding and caring about first?
2) What about the people living in shacks in Appalachia or slums in the Bronx or Chicago’s Southside? Why aren’t they deserving of Glenn Beck’s food, diapers, soccer balls, and Teddy Bears?
3) Shouldn’t we be rushing emergency food to impoverished U.S. citizens and creating shelters for them (due to the Obama economy) before doing this for people from other countries?
4) Do we not have plenty of problems here in America before we start addressing the problems of people from other countries?
5) What is Glenn Beck’s stunt really all about? Why hasn’t he rushed trucks full of stuff to the Bronx or Chicago’s Southside? Why is he less concerned about impoverished Americans than impoverished Guatamalans?
Very strange. It makes no sense whatsover.
Basically, the answer is that he’s become a dupe for Obama.
I always say that when you see something really strange happening that can’t be explained by logic, follow the money.
Follow the money and you will find your answer.
Mormon Church-owned media is a massive enterprise that has consistently supported amnesty for illegal aliens. Glenn Beck is a product of the Mormon media enterprise.
Many business interests benefit from amnesty for illegal aliens. The Mormon Church’s public policy arm has been a dogged supporter of amnesty for illegal aliens.
And let’s not forget that the second most powerful man in America Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid is a Mormon and is in a position to provide significant federal support and benefits to the Mormon Church.
So Glenn Beck, an outspoken Mormon convert, a product of the Mormon Church’s enormous sprawling worldwide media empire, has a clear financial interest in keeping his powerful and wealthy patrons in the Mormon leadership happy.
Glenn Beck’s media enterprise would not be anywhere near as big as it is now without the backing of the LDS church leadership — which fervently backs Amnesty.
Here’s a good paper on the Mormon Church leadership’s massive lobbying efforts for Amnesty >>>
As often happens throughout life, money trumps principle. Money trumps the “rule of law.”
Business interests trump patriotism and love of country.
It’s all about the money.
This is a big problem with many church organizations — not just Mormon, but Christian churches even more so. The Catholic Church in America receives billions of dollars from the U.S. government. The largest protestant denominations also receive billions of dollars from the federal government.
Catholic Charities received $2.9 BILLION from the U.S. government in 2010 — more than half its budget. No doubt, this figure has increased since then.
That’s just one small arm of the Catholic Church. Who knows what the rest of the Catholic Church is receiving from Uncle Sam?
Billions more, no doubt.
The churches have been bought by the U.S. government, meaning bought now by Obama. He controls the cash.
In other words, so much for the “separation of church and state” principle.
The churches have been bought and corrupted by the federal government.
Even the National Association of Evangelicals is now supporting what Obama calls “Comprehensive Immigration Reform.”
Because either their most powerful members are getting lots of money from Uncle Sam. Or, they have a misunderstanding of Scripture. I think the former.
World Vision, a member of the National Association of Evangelicals, receives $200,000,000 per year from the U.S. government. So they’d better keep playing ball with Obama to keep the money, favors and special treatment flowing from Uncle Sam.
The Bible celebrates hospitality. The Bible says we should be welcoming to strangers, travelers, foreigners. This is what we are hearing from the pro-amnesty propaganda machine.
But hospitality and care is a far cry from saying the stranger, the traveler, the alien, the foreigner should be able to just move into your home — permanently.
We want to help the homeless. But should the homeless just be able to move into and take over your home — permanently?
What exactly is ”Comprehensive Immigration Reform” anyway?
Basically, it’s amnesty and pretty much citizenship for the illegal aliens who are here now, then secure the border later.
That’s the promise.
But we now see how well that works.
If people know they can get amnesty (and soon U.S. citizenship) simply by setting foot on American soil, border security can’t work. There’s always a way around, under, or over a border.
Amnesty undermines and destroys even the strongest, most secure border.
And without secure borders, we really aren’t a country anymore — just like if anyone can move into your home, you don’t really have a home.
Should conservative bloggers really be this upset with Glenn Beck for using their stuff without attribution?
I’m thrilled when Glenn and Rush use my stuff. I don’t care if they credit me or not. I just want the info I uncover to get as wide a circulation as possible.
Some conservative bloggers are accusing Glenn Beck of stealing their content and ideas without attribution.
Andrew Brietbart made this charge in an interview with the Daily Caller. Breitbart says Beck stole his “Truth Has No Agenda Slogan.”
Is this really such a brilliant tag line?
According to the Daily Caller article, Beck’s team has used videos from the Media Research Center, Rebel Pundit, and a chart created by Liberty Chick without attribution.
Boy, if I got this upset at all the people who have used my stuff without attribution, I’d have to give up writing.
Pajamas Media CEO Roger Simon is especially peeved. The Daily Caller quotes him as saying: “It is not a question of just doing it right the majority of the time. It is a question of doing it right always,” Simon said. “Doris Kearns Goodwin is forever a fraud in my estimation because she has been caught plagiarizing once. If you rob a bank once, you still robbed a bank.”
Now that’s an exacting standard.
“Doing it right always”?
Who does anything right “always”?
I know I don’t. Besides, Glenn’s not robbing any banks.
Take a chill pill everyone. Your stuff’s really not all that wondrous. We’re not talking about stealing Einstein’s Theory of Relativity here.
For what it’s worth, Glenn Beck has used some of my material and has credited me as the source.
Also, the standards for an academic are more stringent than for a journalist, and certainly more stringent than for a broadcaster. Doris Kearns Goodwin is a famous Harvard historian.
By the way, her proven plagiarism doesn’t seem to have hurt her career much.
But Glenn Beck is a popularizer. He’s a broadcaster (an enormously talented one), not a Pulitzer Prize winning Harvard historian.
Every Thanksgiving, Rush Limbaugh reads lengthy paraphrased passages on the radio pulled from my book, Faith & Freedom, without crediting me.
The paraphrased passages are about the Pilgrims landing at Plymouth Rock in 1620, the first Thanksgiving, their faith in God, and how they learned why capitalism works better than socialism.
The quotes and facts Rush cites all come from those passages in Faith & Freedom. The wording is very close to the same as mine.
But it sure would have helped book sales for me if Rush would have mentioned my book Faith Freedom by name every Thanksgiving.
Think how many books I could have sold if Rush would just do that!
Oh well. Those are the breaks.
Some have said “Ben, you should have your lawyer fire of a tersely worded letter to Rush.”
Why would I want to do that?
I love Rush.
And I like the fact that Rush is reading text borrowed from my book on the air, even though without attribution.
Why would I want Rush to stop doing this?
After all, the entire purpose of my writing this book was to get this information out there. Rush is helping me do that by, essentially, reading my book on the air every Thanksgiving.
Rush has 20,000,000 listeners.
I doubt Rush even knows he’s using my material on the radio without attribution.
Like Glenn Beck, he has a team of researchers who find this stuff for him. Most likely, one of his researchers grabbed the text, paraphrased it, and handed it to him.
I also understand the broadcast medium is different from print media. Imagine how boring your broadcast would be if you meticulously credited every source in the midst of your commentary.
Someone once said: “There’s no limit to what you can accomplish if you don’t care who gets the credit.”
I believe Reagan said that, but I’m sure he got it from someone else.
The truth is there are very few truly original ideas. We are all building on the ideas that others before us have had. I borrowed my ideas for Faith & Freedom largely from Max Weber’s classic work The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism.
My goal is to get these ideas out there. I don’t care who takes credit for them. If someone wants to take something I’ve written and spread it around, great. If they forget to mention me by name, oh well.
No big deal. I’d be just as happy if no one knows my name. I have no interest in being famous.
Soon after my book came out, almost every politician on the conservative side started using the phrase Faith & Freedom. Heck, there’s even a Faith & Freedom Coalition now.
Should I be upset that this phrase is being used without attribution?
I’m just pleased that my book contributed to people seeing the connection between Faith & Freedom and that I had a role in inserting the phrase into the modern political lexicon.
The phrase does have good alliteration . . . which is why I chose it for the title of my book.
Had anyone used the phrase before me? I’m sure they have. I can’t believe I was the first to think of it.
I think these bloggers are way too sensitive on this issue of Glenn Beck borrowing material from others without giving them the proper credit. He puts out an enormous amount of material — three hours of radio every day, his Blaze website, his erstwhile show on FOX.
He has a big research team helping him put his shows together. His researchers are under pressure and probably grab stuff they find and have neglected, on occasion, to give the source the proper credit.
It’s not like these videos and blog posts are works of art. It’s not like Glenn has stolen Hamlet and called it his own.
Liberty Chick is not Shakespeare.
Rebel Pundit is not Dante.
Rebel Pundit might have the best case here for getting mildly annoyed. He says Glenn used one of Rebel’s videos on FOX, but then deliberately blurred out the logo of Rebel Pundit’s website.
Okay, that’s not so good, if true. Possible point here for Rebel Pundit.
Like all of us in the news and comment biz, Rush, Glenn, Sean, Mark and the rest of the media are just frantically grabbing the most interesting info they can find to cobble together an interesting daily show.
Anderson Cooper of CNN actually did a full story on one of my blog posts the other day without mentioning me or this site — just referring to me as “a conservative blogger” — as in “a conservative blogger claims . . .”
But who really cares?
If today’s newspaper is tomorrow’s bird cage liner, what does that make today’s blog post?
Fellow bloggers, stop taking yourselves so seriously. Pull that stick out of your ______.
Chris Matthews and David Brock of the George Soros-funded group Media Matters offer their opinions on Glenn Beck, calling him insane, a fear-monger, an inciter of violence, etc.
Brock and Media Matters have also made it their mission to take down FOX News.
Glenn Beck explains his decision to leave FOX daily show. Says even Paul Revere had to get off his horse.
Glenn Beck really does not give us much of a reason for why he’s leaving FOX, saying only that even Paul Revere had to get off his horse.
Is Glenn just tired? He has alluded to health problems in the past.
FOX was a great platform. Tough to imagine a way for him to get more viewers doing something else. We really don’t learn anything much from this clip.
I’ll certainly miss Glenn on FOX, but will continue to enjoy his radio show.
This can’t be good for FOX.
MEDIA BISTRO: Beck’s Mercury Radio Arts and FNC have reached a deal which will see Beck “transition off of his daily program” later in 2011.
Beck’s much-reported troubles with the advertising community are believed to play a role in the decision.
One wanted to know how long Fox News would “subsidize” the show, which is “filled with house ads.”
“It’s not subsidizing the show at all,” Murdoch fired back, adding that the theatrical Beck gives “a terrific kickoff” to the Fox News evening lineup.
Of course, advertisers like Goldline are not paying the same CPMs that FNC’s other major advertisers were paying, so eventually something would have to give.
As Beck’s ratings have declined over the last year, the economics became even dicier. He may have the number three show in cable news, but without strong advertiser support, it is hard to be sustainable long term.
The deal also includes a production and development deal, which will have Beck and FNC “work together to develop and produce a variety of television projects for air on the FOX News Channel (FNC) as well as content for other platforms including FOX News’ digital properties.”
BEN SAYS: The New York Times, in a piece by David Carr, is making a big deal about Glenn Beck’s supposed declining audience. But all political shows, blogs and publications lose about half their audience in non-election years. In the 5 p.m. EST time slot, Beck gets about the same number of viewers as Sean Hannity who enjoys the covetted 9 p.m. EST time slot. Beck gets nearly three times the viewers Chris Matthews gets in the same time slot. Beck gets more viewers in his time-slot than CNN and MSNBC combined and even runs circles around their prime time line up. Beck consistently scores well ahead of Greta.
The only FOX show that consistently beats Beck is Bill O’Reilly, who occupies the 8 p.m. EST time slot — the best time slot available. Remember, Beck is on at 5 p.m. EST, which is 2 p.m. Pacific Time. About the only way most people can watch Beck is to record his program. Beck is the most recorded political commentary show in the history of broadcasting.
Moreover, Beck has a major Internet presence. So many of Beck’s viewers know they can see, hear and read what Glenn has to say on his Website. If Glenn were to go off TV completely, his fans would find him. Beck’s media company (Mercury Radio Arts) generates about $30 million a year.
I wish my power was fading like this. How’s David Carr’s power doing?
With these facts in mind, here’s what David Carr and the New York Times have to say:
DAVID CARR-NEW YORK TIMES: Since last August, when he summoned more than 100,000 followers [actually
well over 500,000] to the Washington mall for the “Restoring Honor” rally, Mr. Beck has lost over a third of his audience on Fox — a greater percentage drop than other hosts at Fox. True, he fell from the great heights of the health care debate in January 2010, but there has been worrisome erosion — more than one million viewers — especially in the younger demographic.
He still has numbers that just about any cable news host would envy and, with about two million viewers a night, outdraws all his competition combined. But the erosion is significant enough that Fox News officials are willing to say — anonymously, of course; they don’t want to be identified as criticizing the talent — that they are looking at the end of his contract in December and contemplating life without Mr. Beck.
On the other side, people who work for Mr. Beck point out that he could live without Fox News. Unlike some other cable hosts, Mr. Beck has a huge multiplatform presence: he has sold around four million books, is near the top of talk-radio ratings, has a growing Web site called The Blaze, along with a stage performance that still packs houses. Forbes estimated that his company, Mercury Radio Arts, had more than $30 million in revenue.
Maybe it’s time for people who like freedom to boycott Google.
Glenn answers Bill Kristol on the radio