Posts Tagged ‘birth certificate fraud’
JIM O’NEILL-CANADA FREE PRESS: To give a simple, if crude example: say you wanted to send someone a picture of a beach with a beach-ball and palm tree on the sand, but all you have is a photograph of a beach—with no beach-ball, and no palm tree. No problem; you find a picture of apalm tree, say in a magazine; cut it out and place it on the photo of the beach. Then you do the same thing with a beach-ball.
You now have three elements, or layers, to your picture: the beach (or base layer), the beach-ball, and the palm tree—so far so good. But if you showed the “picture,” as it is, to someone, they would easily notice that the beach-ball and palm tree have been added on top of the picture of the sandy beach. So what you do is take a picture of all three elements (layers) together, and show them that picture—a picture of the pictures, so to speak. That way the three layers (objects) are merged into one layer.
With me so far? I hope so, because that’s it. In essence, that is all there is to the forged Obama birth certificate. One element (layer), such as a signature, was added to another element such as a date stamp, and so on until the entire forged document was finished. A major question is why the final “picture of the pictures” was not taken. Why were the various layers not merged together before the document was sent out for public viewing? Link
Why indeed? It is SOP to merge the various layers before considering a Photoshop or Illustrator project finished. Whether you feel that the person who committed the forgery was professional or amateurish, they certainly knew enough to merge the layers of the document, and save the file before sending it out on the Internet. If the layers had been merged the forgery would have been much more difficult to prove. As it is, “THIS DOCUMENT IS FORGED” may as well be stamped on it in bright day-glo letters.
The question becomes why. Part of a grand plan by the Obama camp? A stupid mistake caused by doing a rush job? Intentional sabotage by someone high up in the Hawaiian loop? Your guess is as good as mine at this point.
I should mention that the left-wing has come up with some claptrap about the various layers in the document having something to do with OCR (Optical Character Recognition). They have thrown this nonsense out as disinformation, and to give deluded obots a “life-ring” to grasp. Sadly for them, their “life-ring” doesn’t float. It sinks to the bottom like whale poop. Do not buy into their nonsense for a nano-second. Ask any honest pro in that area of computer expertise (not some left-wing dweeb for God’s sake), and they will tell you the truth. Link Link
In closing, I want to discuss the document that the Hawaiian “Aloha Report” has published. It is reputed to be Obama’s long-form COLB (Certificate Of Live Birth)—identical in format to the forgery released by the White House. It is dated August 4, 1961, and is signed by Obama’s grandmother. It says he was born in Kenya, Africa.Link
I believe that this document is legitimate—it would certainly explain a great deal that has been going on. This may indeed turn out to be the “smoking gun” that the “birthers” have felt existed all along. Obama was born in Africa, but his grandmother registered him with a COLB in Hawaii.
When a COLB such as the one that the “Aloha Reporter” shows was issued, it would have automatically triggered birth announcements in the two Hawaiian newspapers in which blurbs about Obama’s birth are said to have appeared (both papers were in the same building). The fact that he was born in Africa, and not the United States, would no doubt explain Obama wanting to keep his birth records hidden all this time. Link