Posts Tagged ‘birth certificate’

On March 18, 2010, Hawaii’s “Aloha Reporter” published a mocking article about Birthers which included an image of what it purported to be  Barack Obama’s long form birth certificate, or Certificate of Live Birth.

This birth certificate –similar, but not  identical, in format to the forgery released by the White House — is dated August 4, 1961, and is signed by Obama’s grandmother. It says he was born in Kenya, Africa .Link

Actually, it contains contradicting information.

On one line — the Place of Birth line — it says Obama was born in Honoloulu. But on the next line it says he was born in an “Unknown” hospital in Kenya, Africa.

It says again that he was born in Kenya at the bottom of the birth certificate, but that he’s registered in Honolulu. Not sure what the legal meaning of that might be.

Need to do some more research on this oddity.

But it might explain the two birth announcements in the Honolulu papers that appeared several days after Barack’s birth. Birth certificates are often kicked out the the papers automatically. So because the “Place of Birth” line says Honolulu, that’s how this might have happened.

What appears to have happened here is Barack’s mom happened to be in Kenya at the time of his birth, at least from the info on this document.  Who knows?

As with everything about Obama’s background, the mystery deepens the more you examine it.

Much of the other information on the Birth Certificate in the Aloha Reporter is also very different from the information on the digital document released by the White House.

Unlike the digital document released by the White House, this certainly looks more authentic. It also contains information on here that would explain why Obama would spend $2 million to keep this document hidden.

Amusingly, the anti-Birther “Aloha Reporter” printed this version to prove that he was born in Honolulu. They must not have read this document very carefully.

But it does look more real than what the White House gave us last week.

We don’t find any of the Adobe Illustrator or Photoshop layers in this document that we find in the image released by the White House.

So why shouldn’t we believe the “Aloha Reporter” was showing us the true birth certificate?

Here’s the version released last week by the White House

Read the “Aloha Reporter” article here >>>

Read more on why the long form birth certificate the White House claims to have released is a fraud here >>>

 

JIM O’NEILL-CANADA FREE PRESS: To give a simple, if crude example: say you wanted to send someone a picture of a beach with a beach-ball and palm tree on the sand, but all you have is a photograph of a beach—with no beach-ball, and no palm tree. No problem; you find a picture of apalm tree, say in a magazine; cut it out and place it on the photo of the beach. Then you do the same thing with a beach-ball.

You now have three elements, or layers, to your picture: the beach (or base layer), the beach-ball, and the palm tree—so far so good. But if you showed the “picture,” as it is, to someone, they would easily notice that the beach-ball and palm tree have been added on top of the picture of the sandy beach. So what you do is take a picture of all three elements (layers) together, and show them that picture—a picture of the pictures, so to speak. That way the three layers (objects) are merged into one layer.

With me so far? I hope so, because that’s it. In essence, that is all there is to the forged Obama birth certificate. One element (layer), such as a signature, was added to another element such as a date stamp, and so on until the entire forged document was finished. A major question is why the final “picture of the pictures” was not taken. Why were the various layers not merged together before the document was sent out for public viewing? Link

Why indeed? It is SOP to merge the various layers before considering a Photoshop or Illustrator project finished. Whether you feel that the person who committed the forgery was professional or amateurish, they certainly knew enough to merge the layers of the document, and save the file before sending it out on the Internet. If the layers had been merged the forgery would have been much more difficult to prove. As it is, “THIS DOCUMENT IS FORGED” may as well be stamped on it in bright day-glo letters.

The question becomes why. Part of a grand plan by the Obama camp? A stupid mistake caused by doing a rush job? Intentional sabotage by someone high up in the Hawaiian loop? Your guess is as good as mine at this point.

I should mention that the left-wing has come up with some claptrap about the various layers in the document having something to do with OCR (Optical Character Recognition). They have thrown this nonsense out as disinformation, and to give deluded obots a “life-ring” to grasp. Sadly for them, their “life-ring” doesn’t float. It sinks to the bottom like whale poop. Do not buy into their nonsense for a nano-second. Ask any honest pro in that area of computer expertise (not some left-wing dweeb for God’s sake), and they will tell you the truth. Link Link

In closing, I want to discuss the document that the Hawaiian “Aloha Report” has published. It is reputed to be Obama’s long-form COLB (Certificate Of Live Birth)—identical in format to the forgery released by the White House. It is dated August 4, 1961, and is signed by Obama’s grandmother. It says he was born in Kenya, Africa.Link

I believe that this document is legitimate—it would certainly explain a great deal that has been going on.  This may indeed turn out to be the “smoking gun” that the “birthers” have felt existed all along. Obama was born in Africa, but his grandmother registered him with a COLB in Hawaii.

When a COLB such as the one that the “Aloha Reporter” shows was issued, it would have automatically triggered birth announcements in the two Hawaiian newspapers in which blurbs about Obama’s birth are said to have appeared (both papers were in the same building). The fact that he was born in Africa, and not the United States, would no doubt explain Obama wanting to keep his birth records hidden all this time. Link

Read more here >>>

Some things that make you go hmmmmmm

SMOKING GUN: Here are some points of peculiarity sure to be noted by birth certificate sceptics:

• If the original document was in a bound volume (as reflected by the curvature of the left hand side of the certificate), how can the green patterned background of the document’s safety paper be so seamless?

• Why, if Obama was born on August 4, 1961, why was the “Date Accepted by Local Reg.” four days later on August 8, 1961?

• What is the significance of the smudges in the box containing the name of the reported attendant?

• David A. Sinclair, the M.D. who purportedly signed the document, died nearly eight years ago at age 81. So he is conveniently unavailable to answer questions about Obama’s reported birth.

• In the “This Birth” box there are two mysterious Xs above “Twin” and “Triplet.” Is there a sibling or two unaccounted for?

• What is the significance of the mysterious numbers, seen vertically, on the document’s right side?

• Finally, the “Signature of Local Registrar” in box 21 may be a desperate attempt at establishing the document’s Hawaiian authenticity. Note to forgers: it is spelled “Ukulele.”

Read more here >>>

Trump takes credit for getting to bottom of mystery.

Phew!

Looks like our POTUS was born in America after all.

Now let’s see Barack Obama’s other records — for example, his high school and college transcripts, law school transcripts, thesis, medical records, law review articles, other scholarly articles that have not been released or that have mysteriously disappeared.

Meanwhile, Donald Trump is taking credit for forcing the release of the much-sought-after Long Form.

This can’t be good for Jerome Corsi’s book sales.

I’ll be interested in his response.

USA TODAY: According to a new poll by USA TODAY poll, only 38% of Americans say Obama definitely was born in the USA, and 18% say he probably was. Fifteen percent say he probably was born in another country, and 9% say he definitely was born elsewhere.

Read more here >>>

Even rank-and-file Democrats are starting to wonder about this.

Things that make you go Hmmmmmmm . . .

Kenyan Ambassador says Barack Obama was born in Kenya . . .

NEW YORK TIMES:A plurality of Republican voters, 47 percent, said they believed Mr. Obama was born in another country; 22 percent said they did not know where he was born, and 32 percent said they believed he was born in the United States.

Read more here >>>

U.K. DAILY MAIL: It turns out Barack Obama was dreaming big right from an early age -

at just nine-years-old he announced he was going to be the prime minister of Indonesia.

The episode from a new biography of the president’s mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, reveals the roots of a hunger for power which has driven Mr Obama’s heady rise from an eccentric upbringing in Hawaii and Indonesia to the White House.

It will bring a wry smile to the faces of ‘birthers’, who are not satisfied he was born in the U.S.

In A Singular Woman: The Untold Story of Barack Obama’s Mother, author Janny Scott tells how young Barack – then known by the westernised abbreviation of ‘Barry’ – was pushed by his mother to reach for the sky right from the start.

Mrs Dunham died when she was just 52, never knowing the incredible heights her son would achieve.

But, according to the book, she had no doubts about his potential, even when he was nine.

Ms Scott wrote: ‘It was clear to many that Ann believed Barry, in particular, was unusually gifted. She would boast about his brains, his achievements, how brave he was.’

Read more here >>>

“Missing Records in Hawaii . . . Missing Records in Kenya . . . Missing Records in Indonesia”

DRUDGE REPORT: This year’s high stakes publishing project quietly went to press this week, the
DRUDGE REPORT has learned.

After years of research and digging by the nation’s top private investigators, here it comes:

“WHERE’S THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE? The Case that Barack Obama is not Eligible to be President.”

Read more here >>>

THE STREET: A new book may add to the growing controversy about the so-called “birther” issue, which questions where President Barack Obama was born.

Jerome Corsi’s new book titled “Where’s the Birth Certificate? The Case that Barack Obama is not Eligible to be President” challenges Obama’s constitutional eligibility to be president based on the contention that he was born outside the country.

Read more here >>>

Here’s the intriguing description of the book on Amazon.com . . .

Over the course of more than three years of research, Jerome Corsi assembles the evidence that Barack Obama is constitutionally ineligible for the office of the presidency. As a New York Times bestselling author, Harvard graduate, and investigative journalist, Corsi exposes in detail key issues with Obama’s eligibility, including the fact the President has spent millions of dollars in legal fees to avoid providing the American people with something as simple as a long-form birth certificate. The eligibility issue has major ramifications for every American, and through Corsi’s in-depth research, a clear, concise, and compelling case is made for a return to Founding Father principles and transparent, constitutional government, starting from the top down.

The question here really is what’s worse?  That Obama is not eligible to be President, or that he is.

If he is eligible, it’s morally indefensible that he’s allowing a third of the country to have honest doubts about his eligibility when it would be so easy for him to clear up the question simply by releasing his long-form birth certificate — not the short-form one that comes off a printer. The real birth certificate that has a signature and a seal.

When serious doubts are raised, the POTUS has a moral duty to assure the American people that he is who he says he is . . . if he can.  On the other hand . . .

If Obama is not eligible, that’s actually is not as bad morally because then, at least, it’s understandable why he does not release his birth certificate.  He can’t.  You can’t do what you can’t do.

 

Looking Out for Number One author Robert Ringer joins Donald Trump by asking obvious questions about who Obama is, where he came from, and why we can’t get answers.

ROBERT RINGER: I’ve long wondered if Republicans can field a candidate who has the courage to ignore the unwritten rule that it’s politically incorrect to speak the truth about America’s current make-believe president.

When George Bush graciously turned over the White House keys to the mysterious man with the mysterious background, few realized he was handing America’s top secrets to the enemies from within. But given the swiftness with which Obama began implementing his collectivist, anti-America agenda, it didn’t take long for millions of voters to wake up. Sadly, however, many more millions still choose to ignore his anti-American words and actions and write off those who oppose him as racists or right-wing radicals.

Which is why I find it so refreshing that someone of Donald Trump’s stature had the courage to come forward and demand that Barack Obama produce his birth certificate. Notwithstanding all the evidence that has been presented by Jerome Corsi and others who have been on top of this issue since long before Obama was elected, the left has succeeded in silencing anyone who has dared broach the subject by writing them off as conspiracy nuts.

Read more here >>>

Donald Trump says he has sent a team of investigators to Hawaii to find out about Barack Obama’s birth certificate. Trump says: “You won’t believe what they’re finding.”

Trump says the only thing Obama has done well is get elected. Says ObamaCare is a total disaster. Says the world “laughs at us” because of Obama’s incompetence. Says Obama is destroying the country.

I can’t want to see what Trump’s team of detectives and investigators comes up with in Hawaii on the true origins of Obama’s birth. Gotta love The Donald.

Trump seems to think this issue could become the defining issue of the 2012 campaign.

What a scream.

The Donald also says he’s a Tea Partier. The rest of the GOP field looks pretty lame. Why not The Donald for President in 2012?

We’d probably see some Bimbo Eruptions.  But that didn’t seem to hurt Bill Clinton.

At least, Trump has actually run something . . . and been very successful at it.